An examination of philosophical views on the existence of god

Thomson, Nobel Prize winning physicist, discoverer of the electron. Thomson, who was a devout Christian, is recognized as the founder of atomic physics. There is no conflict between science and religion.

An examination of philosophical views on the existence of god

An encyclopedia of philosophy articles written by professional philosophers.

Nature and scope of metaphysics Origin of the term Etymologically the term metaphysics is unenlightening. Aristotle had distinguished two tasks for the philosopher: Modern readers of Aristotle are inclined to take both the Physica and the Metaphysica as philosophical treatises; the distinction their titles suggest between an empirical and a conceptual inquiry has little foundation.

Aristotle was not indifferent to factual material either in natural or in metaphysical philosophy, but equally he was not concerned in either case to frame theories for empirical testing. It is also evident that the connection marked in the original titles is a genuine one: Plato, following the early Greek philosopher Parmenideswho is known as the father of metaphysicshad sought to distinguish opinion, or belieffrom knowledge and to assign distinct objects to each.

CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Philosophy

Opinion, for Plato, was a form of apprehension that was shifting and unclear, similar to seeing things in a dream or only through their shadows; its objects were correspondingly unstable.

Knowledge, by contrast, was wholly lucid; it carried its own guarantee against error, and the objects with which it was concerned were eternally what they were, and so were exempt from change and the deceptive power to appear to be what they were not.

Plato called the objects of opinion phenomenaor appearances ; he referred to the objects of knowledge as noumena objects of the intelligence or quite simply as realities. The education of the Platonic philosopher consisted precisely in effecting this transition: Philosophy for Plato was thus a call to recognize the existence and overwhelming importance of a set of higher realities that ordinary men—even those, like the Sophists of the time, who professed to be enlightened—entirely ignored.

That there were such realities, or at least that there was a serious case for thinking that there were, was a fundamental tenet in the discipline that later became known as metaphysics. Conversely, much of the subsequent controversy about the very possibility of metaphysics has turned on the acceptability of this tenet and on whether, if it is rejected, some alternative foundation can be discovered on which the metaphysician can stand.

Characterizations of metaphysics Before considering any such question, however, it is necessary to examine, without particular historical references, some ways in which actual metaphysicians have attempted to characterize their enterprise, noticing in each case the problems they have in drawing a clear line between their aims and those of the practitioners of the exact and empirical sciences.

Four views will be briefly considered; they present metaphysics as: Reflection on what is said under the different heads will quickly establish that they are not sharply separate from one another, and, indeed, individual metaphysical writers sometimes invoke more than one of these phrases when asked to say what metaphysics is—as, for example, the British Idealist F.

Naturalism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Bradley does in the opening pages of his work Appearance and Reality An inquiry into what exists A common set of claims on behalf of metaphysics is that it is an inquiry into what exists ; its business is to subject common opinion on this matter to critical scrutiny and in so doing to determine what is truly real.

It can be asserted with some confidence that common opinion is certainly an unreliable guide about what exists, if indeed it can be induced to pronounce on this matter at all.

An examination of philosophical views on the existence of god

Are dream objects real, in the way in which palpable realities such as chairs and trees are? Are numbers real, or should they be described as no more than abstractions?

Is the height of a man a reality in the same sense in which he is a reality, or is it just an aspect of something more concretea mere quality that has derivative rather than substantial being and could not exist except as attributed to something else? It is easy enough to confuse the common man with questions like these and to show that any answers he gives to them tend to be ill thought-out.

It is equally difficult, however, for the metaphysician to come up with more satisfactory answers of his own. Many metaphysicians have relied, in this connection, on the internally related notions of substance, qualityand relation ; they have argued that only what is substantial truly exists, although every substance has qualities and stands in relation to other substances.

Thus, this tree is tall and deciduous and is precisely 50 yards north of that fence.

An examination of philosophical views on the existence of god

Difficulties begin, however, as soon as examples like these are taken seriously. Assume for the moment that an individual tree—what might be called a concrete existent—qualifies for the title of substance; it is just the sort of thing that has qualities and stands in relations.

Unless there were substances in this sense, no qualities could be real:c. reason can prove the existence of God, but having such a proof is not necessary to have faith.

Bayesian reasoning is shown to justify sceptical views on many topics, including the existence of God. Part 2 shifts the focus to the God of classical theism and monotheism, examining the evidence and arguments from scientific, historical, and philosophical perspectives/5(). The God of Miracles: An Exegetical Examination of God's Action in the World [C. John Collins] on barnweddingvt.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Part of the debate over God's existence centers on questions about the possibility and provability of miracles. Collins begins by presenting and contrasting the options within traditional Christian . Naturalism. Naturalism is an approach to philosophical problems that interprets them as tractable through the methods of the empirical sciences or at least, without a distinctively a priori project of theorizing. For much of the history of philosophy it has been widely held that philosophy involved a distinctive method, and could achieve .

d. having objective reasons for believing in God's existence is a necessary first step to having faith in God. the philosophy of Emmanuel Kant, asserting that the nature of the mind renders it unable to know reality immediately, that the mind interprets data presented to it as phenomena in space and time, and that the reason, in order to find a meaningful basis for experience or in order for ethical conduct to exist, may postulate things unknowable to it, as the existence .

The God of Miracles: An Exegetical Examination of God's Action in the World [C. John Collins] on barnweddingvt.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

Part of the debate over God's existence centers on questions about the possibility and provability of miracles. Collins begins by presenting and contrasting the options within traditional Christian . Philosophy of religion is "the philosophical examination of the central themes and concepts involved in religious traditions." [1] These sorts of philosophical discussion are ancient, and can be found in the earliest known manuscripts concerning philosophy.

Naturalism. Naturalism is an approach to philosophical problems that interprets them as tractable through the methods of the empirical sciences or at least, without a distinctively a priori project of theorizing.

For much of the history of philosophy it has been widely held that philosophy involved a distinctive method, and could achieve . This book is an examination of the modal metaphysics of Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibniz, with the central focus on Leibniz's views on necessity, and especially his .

Quotes about Godif you think science leads to atheism.